Decriminalising homosexuality: What this means for Sri Lanka

Share on facebook
Share on whatsapp
Share on twitter
Share on email

Decriminalisation is an extremely important and long overdue step. It will show that the law, rightfully, does not view same-sex relationships as an offence, a wrong or something that requires state interference or punishment.

In August 2022, a Private Members’ Bill was initiated by MP Premnath C. Dolawatte and the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) calling for the decriminalisation of homosexuality and the amendment of Sections 365 and 365A of the Penal Code. The President announced that the government would not take action to block the Bill shortly after it was presented. The ruling party as well as several other parties have since stated their support for the Bill’s passing. The draft Bill has been referred to the Attorney General’s Department to assess its alignment with the Sri Lankan Constitution.  

If the Bill passes, Sri Lanka would become the 30th Asian country to decriminalise homosexuality. Same-sex marriages, however, would not be legalised.  
The decriminalisation of same-sex relationships would play an integral role in reducing discrimination against members of the LGBTIQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Questioning/Queer) community, and has been a focal aim of activists.   

“For a very long time, we have tried many avenues through which to convince the government to decriminalise consenting same-sex relationships. It’s a wait-and-see game because we know what has happened in the past. Hopefully, the people in power have learned from their mistakes, opened their eyes and become less discriminatory. There’s a lot of hope,” shared Rosanna Flamer-Caldera, LGBTIQ rights activist and Founder of Equal Ground.  

The Bill: far from perfect

Dolawatte’s Private Member Bill has sparked progressive conversation within many political parties as well as amongst the public. However, an important detail of this Bill is that it seeks to amend sections 365 and 365A, rather than repeal them.  
The proposed amendment to section 365 retains the criminalisation of carnal intercourse with animals. It can be noted that this is already covered in Section 2(1) of the Prevention of Cruelty To Animals Act.  
The Bill seeks to amend section 365A to criminalise gross acts of indecency committed in certain contexts, specifically:  

  • Without the consent of the other person,  
  • With or without the consent of the other person when that person is under 16 years of age,  
  • With the consent of the other person while one such other person was in lawful of unlawful detention or where that consent has been obtained, by use of force, or intimidation, or threat of detention or by putting such other person in fear of death or hurt,  
  • With the consent of the other person where such consent has been obtained at a time the other person was of unsound mind or was in a state of intoxication induced by alcohol or drugs.  

This proposed amendment carries an overlap with sections 363 and 364 of the Penal Code as well as the Prevention of Torture Act and laws on abuse.   
Satkunanathan commented, “There is no rationale for not repealing sections 365 and 365A and then amending provisions in the laws that are criticized for being  gender specific to be gender neutral. Continued retention of sections 365 and 365A after amendment makes them redundant because they will then cover areas that are already dealt with by existing law”.
Flamer-Caldera expressed the same concern. “I don’t see why they can’t take off 365 and 365A completely and just decriminalise the same. We don’t know how the government is going to tweak these laws. We’re concerned. I’m concerned,” she remarked.  


The decriminalisation of homosexuality does have the power to change how the police and various state actors treat LGBTIQ individuals as well as open the door towards achieving positive social change


The current reality

“The LGBTIQ community is currently marginalised in all social services, unless you don’t say you are gay or lesbian or part of the community and are able to ‘pass’. We don’t want to ‘pass’ in order to be treated as full citizens,” shared Flamer-Caldera.  

This marginalisation has resulted in the inequitable treatment of LGBTIQ individuals, thus limiting their access to healthcare, justice and fair consideration in the workplace. Children are bullied and treated differently by teachers. Slurs are yelled out in public and arbitrary arrests are made. The decriminalisation of homosexuality does, therefore, have the power to change how the police and various state actors treat LGBTIQ individuals as well as open the door towards achieving positive social change.  

“We are a very puritanical and conservative society as well as a hypocritical society.  For example, people don’t want sex-ed taught in schools. Teaching sex-ed does not corrupt children, it makes them more aware. It makes them safer by giving them the knowledge to protect themselves. This is important so that they do not grow up with sexist, misogynistic values. It is this lack of awareness and understanding that creates environments which enable violence against women and LGBTIQ persons” said Satkunanathan.  
She further commented, “We have a Member of Parliament using abusive, sexist language against a woman Parliamentarian, and that apparently is okay but teaching children about their bodies and their sexuality is not. This denial and hypocrisy is harming us”.

Creating a culture of acceptance

There is still a huge stigma and a sense of propagated shame surrounding the LGBTIQ community in Sri Lanka which has resulted in them being mistreated and discriminated against.


Join our
Mailing List

* indicates required
/ ( mm / dd )